Two cases of new-born puppies with transient pulmonary edema.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Acute pulmonary edema in puppies generally occurs due to congenital left-right shunts such as patent ductus arteriosus or large ventricular septal defects. Herein, we presented two cases of puppies with no apparent congenital cardiovascular disease. Case 1: A 12-day-old male Labrador Retriever, weighing 1.15 kg, was unable to suckle sufficiently from its dam and exhibited laboured breathing. Pulmonary edema was identified in all lung lobes by radiography, furthermore, echocardiography revealed significant enlargement of the left side of the heart. Pulmonary edema secondary to volume overload was suspected and furosemide was administered. The respiratory status was improved on the following day. Pimobendan was administered orally in addition to furosemide and both were withdrawn 6 weeks later when the heart size was normalized. Case 2: A 15-day-old female Standard Poodle, weighing 0.68 kg, was less active than other littermates and exhibited laboured breathing. Radiography revealed pulmonary edema in the right posterior lobe, dilatation of the caudal vena cava and ascites. Echocardiography revealed significant enlargement of the left atrium and ventricle perhaps owing to decreased left ventricular contractility. Furosemide and pimobendan were administered. One week later, appetite was improved and supraventricular tachycardia of 375 bpm was observed. Therefore, tachycardia-induced dilated cardiomyopathy was suspected which returned to sinus rhythm with diltiazem treatment, however, it was recurred. Upon sotalol monotherapy, a normal heart size was observed seven months later. In conclusion, we encountered two new-born puppies with transient pulmonary edema that were temporarily treated with pimobendan and furosemide.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".