MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4376870643 · doi:10.1061/ijgnai.gmeng-8459

Spline Search for Slip Surfaces in 3D Slopes

2023· article· en· W4376870643 on OpenAlexaff
Terence Ma, Brigid Cami, Sina Javankhoshdel, Brent Corkum, Nicolas Chan, Amir H. Gandomi

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Geomechanics · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicGeotechnical Engineering and Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of WaterlooGeomechanica (Canada)Rocscience (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMathematicsSlip (aerodynamics)GeometrySlippingParametric surfaceEllipsoidSlope stability analysisSurface (topology)Parametric statisticsSlope stabilityMathematical analysisGeologyGeotechnical engineeringEngineeringGeodesy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A novel method involving the transformation of spline surfaces is introduced to search for the critical slip surface in a three-dimensional (3D) slope, which corresponds to the minimum limit equilibrium method factor of safety for overall slope stability. A slipping surface in a slope can be represented as the intersection of any continuous geometrical entity with the slope topography, over which the mass of sliding soil is discretized to solve for the factor of safety satisfying given equilibrium conditions. Traditionally, many researchers have searched for a critical ellipsoidal or spherical surface, or surfaces formed using other simple shapes. However, the critical slip surface in complicated cases, for example, a landslide, is seldom purely ellipsoidal or spherical, which leads to overestimations of the true factor of safety in a slope. To provide greater flexibility for transforming the shape of the slip surfaces during a global search, the geometry representing the slip surface is assumed to be in the form of a nonuniform rational basis spline (NURBS) surface in this paper. The proposed method involves varying the parameters of a parametric exponential function, which spawns control points within its domain to create NURBS surfaces. The parameters in the exponential function are varied to transform the slipping surface using a metaheuristic search algorithm, such as particle swarm optimization. A major advantage of the proposed method is that the final spline surface in the search is formulated such that it can then be locally optimized using surface altering optimization methods by adjusting the locations of its control points.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.556
Threshold uncertainty score0.298

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of GeomechanicsSame topicGeotechnical Engineering and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207