Genomic asymmetry of the <i>Brassica napus</i> seed: epigenetic contributions of <scp>DNA</scp> methylation and small <scp>RNAs</scp> to subgenome bias
Bibliographic record
Abstract
SUMMARY Polyploidy is a persistent phenomenon in angiosperm genome evolution that is hypothesized to have contributed to the diversity of extant flowering plants. Brassica napus , one of the world's most important angiosperm oilseed species, originated from the interspecific hybridization of Brassica rapa (A n ) and Brassica oleracea (C n ). While the trends of genome dominance in transcriptomics are beginning to emerge, less is known about the epigenetic and small RNA landscapes in polyploids during reproductive development. The seed is the pivotal developmental transition into the new sporophytic generation, and experiences substantial epigenetic modifications over time. Here, we investigated the prevalence of bias in the contexts of DNA methylation and small interfering (si)RNA profiles in both subgenomes (A n and C n ), as well as the ancestral fractionated genomes across B. napus seed development. We report ubiquitous C n subgenome bias of siRNA expression and cytosine methylation, with DNA methylation being particularly abundant on gene promoters in the C n subgenome. Further, we provide evidence that siRNA transcriptional patterns were conserved within the ancestral triplicated subgenomes of B. napus , but not across the A n and C n subgenomes. We discuss how methylation patterns in the B. napus seed relate to genes, promoter regions, siRNA loci and transposable elements through the lens of genome fractionation and polyploidization. Taken together we provide evidence for epigenetic regulation selectively silencing the C n subgenome during seed development, and explore the impact of genome fractionation on the epigenetic components of the B. napus seed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".