Solvent Extraction, Sequential Separation and Trace Determination of La (III), Ce (III), Nd (III) and Gd (III) with 2, 14-bis[m-nitrophenyl]-Calix[4]Resorcinarene-8, 20-bis[N- phenylbenzo]-dihydroxamic Acid
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A novel reagent 2,14-bis[m-nitrophenyl]-calix[4]resorcinarene-8,20-bis[N-phenylbenzo]-dihydroxamic acid (NPC4RADHA) is reported for the liquid-liquid extraction, separation, and simultaneous trace determination of La(III), Ce(III), Nd(III), and Gd(III). The method involves optimizing various parameters such as the concentration of NPC4RADHA, pH, solvent, and extraction time to achieve maximum purity (99.98%) extraction of these rare earths. The stability constant, molar absorptivity, and Beer’s law have been studied. The extracted samples were directly analyzed by ICP-AES, which improves sensitivity with determination limits of 0.020 ng/mL, 0.028 ng/mL, 0.018 ng/mL and 0.025 ng/mL for La, Ce, Nd, and Gd, respectively. The method has been applied to the determination of these elements in monazite sand and standard geological samples. The separation and determination mixture of a Ce(III) and Ce(IV) has been reported.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".