Faktor-Faktor yang Berhubungan dengan Perilaku Seks Pranikah pada Remaja di SMA Negeri 2 Sarolangun Tahun 2022
Bibliographic record
Abstract
According to IDHS (2012), the prevalence of pre-marital sex cases was 14.6% among young women aged 15-19 years. The reasons for premarital sexual intercourse were mostly due to curiosity/curiosity (57.5%), it just happened to women (38%), and was forced by partners (12.6%) to women. The aim of the research is to find out the factors related to premarital sexual behavior in adolescents at SMA Negeri 2 Sarolangun in 2022. This research is analytic in nature with a cross sectional research design. The research was carried out at SMA Negeri 2 Sarolangun and was carried out in June 2022. The population for this research was all students of class X and XI SMA Negeri 2 Sarolangun as many as 243 people. The sample of this research is 70 people. The data analysis used was univariate and bivariate analysis. The results showed that there was a relationship between family support and premarital sex behavior in adolescents with a p-value = 0.000, there was a relationship between information sources and premarital sex behavior in adolescents with a p-value of 0.003, and there was a relationship between knowledge and premarital sex behavior in adolescents. adolescents with a p-value of 0.001.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".