Design of a high-voltage electrostatic ultrasonic atomization nozzle and its droplet adhesion effects on aeroponically cultivated plant roots
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In the process of aeroponics cultivation, the atomizer is one of the most important influencing factors on the cultivation process. This paper presented the design of an ultrasonic atomization nozzle using contact charging and a root droplet adhesion test rig. The purpose of this study was to reveal the relationship between the main operating parameters of the high-voltage electrostatic ultrasonic atomization nozzle and the atomization effect using droplet adhesion measurements. In this study, the ultrasonic effect of nozzle was achieved by using Laval tube, and the design of the key parameters for the high-voltage electrostatic ultrasonic atomization nozzle were inlet pressure, electrostatic voltage root core electrode material and spray distance; the droplet size variation and root adhesion patterns were obtained through experiments. The best operating parameters were analyzed by using the orthogonal test method, and the droplet deposition distribution of the root system at different scales was investigated in the atomization chamber. The test results revealed that when the root core electrode material was coppe and the nozzle working parameters were at 0.4 MPa of inlet pressure, at 1.75 m the spray distance, at 12 kV of the electrostatic voltage, the root system has the highest droplet adhesion. Keywords: ultrasonic nozzle, high pressure electrostatic system, droplet size measurement, root adhesion test, droplet deposition effect DOI: 10.25165/j.ijabe.20231602.7222 Citation: Gao J M, Guo Y N, Tunio M H, Chen X C, Chen Z J. Design of a high-voltage electrostatic ultrasonic atomization nozzle and its droplet adhesion effect on aeroponically cultivated plant roots. Int J Agric & Biol Eng, 2023; 16(2): 30–37.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".