MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4377011620 · doi:10.1038/s41390-023-02649-4

Early neurodevelopmental outcomes of extreme preterm infants exposed to paracetamol: a retrospective cohort study

2023· article· en· W4377011620 on OpenAlexaff
Bella Zhong, Kenneth Tan, Abdul Razak, Vathana Sackett, Catherine Machipisa, Lindsay Zhou, Samira Samiee‐Zafarghandy, Arvind Sehgal, Rod W. Hunt, Pramod Pharande, Anil K. Malhotra

Bibliographic record

VenuePediatric Research · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiovascular Conditions and Treatments
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
FundersNational Health and Medical Research CouncilCerebral Palsy Alliance
KeywordsMedicineCerebral palsyPediatricsRetrospective cohort studyCohortDuctus arteriosusBirth weightCohort studyLow birth weightAdverse effectPregnancySurgeryInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Paracetamol is commonly used for analgesia and patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) treatment in preterm infants. We aimed to evaluate early neurodevelopmental outcomes of extreme preterm infants exposed to paracetamol during their neonatal admission. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included surviving infants born at <29 weeks gestation, or with a birth weight of <1000 grams. Neurodevelopmental outcomes studied were early cerebral palsy (CP) or high risk of CP diagnosis, Hammersmith Infant Neurological Examination (HINE) score and Prechtl General Movement Assessment (GMA) at 3-4 months corrected age. RESULTS: Two hundred and forty-two infants were included, of which 123 were exposed to paracetamol. After adjusting for birth weight, sex and chronic lung disease, there were no significant associations between paracetamol exposure and early CP or high risk of CP diagnosis (aOR 1.46, 95% CI 0.61, 3.5), abnormal or absent GMA (aOR 0.82, 95% CI 0.37, 1.79) or HINE score (adjusted β -0.19, 95% CI -2.39, 2.01). Subgroup analysis stratifying paracetamol exposure into <180 mg/kg or ≥180 mg/kg cumulative dose found that neither had significant effects on outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: In this cohort of extreme preterm infants, no significant association was found between exposure to paracetamol during the neonatal admission and adverse early neurodevelopment. IMPACT: Paracetamol is commonly used in the neonatal period for analgesia and patent ductus arteriosus treatment in preterm infants, although prenatal paracetamol use has been associated with adverse neurodevelopmental outcomes. Exposure to paracetamol during the neonatal admission was not associated with adverse early neurodevelopment at 3-4 months corrected age in this cohort of extreme preterm infants. The findings from this observational study is consistent with the small body of literature supporting the lack of association between neonatal paracetamol exposure and adverse neurodevelopmental outcomes in preterm infants.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.583

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.091
GPT teacher head0.376
Teacher spread0.285 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePediatric ResearchSame topicCardiovascular Conditions and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207