MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

P321 NEOVASC REDUCER IMPLANTATION AS A USEFUL THERAPEUTIC CHANCE IN REFRACTORY ANGINA

2023· article· en· W4377019527 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Vincenzo Acerbo, G. De Michele, Gaetana Raucci, G Scherillo, Giovanni Signore, F Rotolo, Francesco Scialla, Arturo Cesaro, Paolo Calabrò

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Heart Journal Supplements · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac pacing and defibrillation studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineCardiologyCoronary sinusAnginaInternal medicineContraindicationAngioplastyStentRight coronary arterySurgeryCoronary angiographyMyocardial infarction

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Refractory angina is a clinical condition caused by myocardial ischemia inadequately controlled by medical therapy and coronary revascularization. Emblematic case of this condition concerns a 72–year–old man with chronic coronary syndrome (percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty [PTCA] + drug–eluting stent [DES] on the proximal portion of the left main coronary artery [LMCA] in 2009 and PTCA + 2 overlapping DES on the proximal portion of the right coronary artery [RCA] in 2017) who accessed in the emergency room for unstable angina. The patient‘s past medical history was positive for repeated hospitalizations for unstable angina: in particular, was registered an admission in 2019 with angiographic evidence of intermediate stenosis 30% at the mid–distal tract of LMCA and good distant outcome of previously implanted stents on LMCA and RCA, and a further admission in 2021 with coronary evidence overlapping the previous one. In both hospitalizations, medical therapy optimization was carried out by adding also 2nd–line drugs to the antianginal therapy with Bisoprolol 2.5 mg and Amlodipine 5 mg such as transdermal Nitroglycerin 15 mg, Ranolazine 750 mg bis in die, and subsequently Trimetazidine 20 mg ter in die during the first and second hospitalizations, respectively. In the context of this re–hospitalization, coronarography was repeated again with evidence of unchanged angiographic picture from the previous one (2021) and, in view of the refractoriness of the anginal symptoms, was placed an indication for Neovasc Reducer device implantation. This device creates a pressor gradient in the coronary sinus, determining a redistribution of blood flow from the subepicardial areas to the ischemic subendocardial areas. Therefore, by performing jugular venous access we engaged the coronary sinus with 6F diagnostic catheter then by mother and child technique we placed the 9F guide catheter advancing as distally as possible in the coronary sinus and finally we implanted the Neovasc Reducer device (4 atm for 60‘‘), obtaining a good final angiographic result. At 6–month follow–up, the patient experienced symptomatic improvement, in particular he improved by 2 Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS) angina classes. The Neovasc Reducer device, by improving quality of life and reducing the need for hospitalizations for unstable angina, is a viable therapeutic strategy in patients angina unresponsive to medical therapy and coronary revascularization.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.156
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.077
GPT teacher head0.376
Teacher spread0.299 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEuropean Heart Journal SupplementsSame topicCardiac pacing and defibrillation studiesFrench-language works237,207