MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4377037161 · doi:10.1061/jggefk.gteng-11324

Effect of Relative Density and Particle Morphology on the Bearing Capacity and Collapse Mechanism of Strip Footings in Sand

2023· article· en· W4377037161 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Rameez A. Raja, Venkata A. Sakleshpur, Mônica Prezzi, Rodrigo Salgado

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicGeotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeotechnical engineeringRoundness (object)Relative densityBearing capacityGeologyShear (geology)Settlement (finance)Shear bandMaterials scienceComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents the results of a series of load tests performed on a half-strip model footing (width B=50 mm) placed on the surface of samples prepared with one of two uniform silica sands [Ohio Gold Frac (OGF) sand and Ottawa 20–30 (OTC) sand] with different relative densities. The sand samples were air-pluviated inside a half-cylindrical calibration chamber equipped with imaging capabilities. Sequential, high-resolution images taken during the model footing load tests were analyzed using the digital image correlation (DIC) technique to obtain the displacement and strain fields in the sand domain. The effect of sand relative density on the footing load–settlement curves and bearing capacity factor Nγ was investigated for both OGF and OTC sands. The results obtained from the model footing load tests show that, for a given relative density, the bearing capacity of the footing and the value of Nγ decrease with increasing roundness of the sand particles; the effect of particle roundness on the value of Nγ is more pronounced for dense sand than for loose sand. Different points on the footing load–settlement curve were identified to investigate the development of the collapse mechanism of the model footing. Plots of the maximum shear strain contours were shown to adequately capture shear localization in the sand domain during model footing loading. The thickness of the shear band was found to be on the order of 10D50 and 7D50 for the model footing tested on dense OGF and OTC sand samples, respectively.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.175
Threshold uncertainty score0.427

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.176
Teacher spread0.171 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental EngineeringSame topicGeotechnical Engineering and Underground StructuresFrench-language works237,207