Renormalized phonon spectrum in the Su–Schrieffer–Heeger model
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Motivated to understand phonon spectrum renormalization in the ground state of the half-filled Su–Schrieffer–Heeger model, we use the Born–Oppenheimer approximation together with the harmonic approximation to evaluate semi-analytically the all-to-all real-space ionic force constants generated through both linear and quadratic electron-phonon coupling. We then compute the renormalized phonon spectrum and the corresponding lattice zero-point energy (ZPE) as a function of the lattice dimerization. Crucially, the latter is included in the system’s total energy, and thus has a direct effect on the equilibrium dimerization. We find that inclusion of a small quadratic coupling leads to very significant changes in the predicted equilibrium dimerization, calling into question the use of the linear approximation for this model. We also argue that inclusion of the ZPE is key for systems with comparable lattice and electronic energies, and/or for finite size chains. Our method can be straightforwardly generalized to study similar problems in higher dimensions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".