MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4377088076 · doi:10.1126/sciadv.adg2379

Molecular evolution of Keap1 was essential for adaptation of vertebrates to terrestrial life

2023· article· en· W4377088076 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Kanae Yumimoto, Shigeaki Sugiyama, Saori Motomura, Daisuke Takahashi, Keiichi I. Nakayama

Bibliographic record

VenueScience Advances · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGenomics, phytochemicals, and oxidative stress
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersJapan Science and Technology AgencyJapan Society for the Promotion of ScienceInstitute of GeneticsJapan Agency for Medical Research and Development
KeywordsKEAP1ZebrafishBiologyAdaptation (eye)MutantUbiquitin ligaseGeneticsTranscription factorReactive oxygen speciesGeneUbiquitinEvolutionary biologyCell biology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reactive oxygen species (ROS) posed a risk for the transition of vertebrates from aquatic to terrestrial life. How ancestral organisms adapted to such ROS exposure has remained a mystery. Here, we show that attenuation of the activity of the ubiquitin ligase CRL3Keap1 for the transcription factor Nrf2 during evolution was key to development of an efficient response to ROS exposure. The Keap1 gene was duplicated in fish to give rise to Keap1A and the only remaining mammalian paralog Keap1B, the latter of which shows a lower affinity for Cul3 and contributes to robust Nrf2 induction in response to ROS exposure. Mutation of mammalian Keap1 to resemble zebrafish Keap1A resulted in an attenuated Nrf2 response, and most knock-in mice expressing such a Keap1 mutant died on exposure as neonates to sunlight-level ultraviolet radiation. Our results suggest that molecular evolution of Keap1 was essential for adaptation to terrestrial life.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.029
Threshold uncertainty score0.266

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.289
Teacher spread0.277 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations19
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueScience AdvancesSame topicGenomics, phytochemicals, and oxidative stressFrench-language works237,207