Performing Childhood: Maddie Ziegler and the Presentation of Young Girls in Video Clips
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Since the 1980s, the production of video clips has been on the rise. Over the past couple of years, clips showing dance choreographies, often embedded within a rather conceptual fictional framework, have greatly increased in popularity. Although the musicians are usually adults, it is not uncommon to cast children and young adults to perform in the videos. At the same time, multiple reality TV formats in which children and young adults compete performing dance choreographies to famous pop songs have become a popular form of entertainment. The American TV series Dance Moms is a prominent example of this phenomenon. One of the best-known young artists in the field is Maddie Ziegler, who made her debut in this show and subsequently appeared in several music videos by the singer Sia. Maddie, born in 2002, was eleven years old when she first performed in a video clip. Her career is emblematic of the presentation of young girls in a popular culture and media that is dominated by the deliberate play with expectations of age and the blurring of categorical distinctions. Drawing on Maddie Ziegler as an example, the following article provides a close analysis of the presentation of young girls in video clips and reality shows. Special attention is given to the atemporal image of adolescence in these adult reconstructions, which, instead of celebrating the rebellious potential of youth, oscillate between the angelic outer appearance of the child and the serious demeanour of the adult.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".