Inferior Mesenteric Artery Snorkel for Endovascular Treatment of a Large Degenerating Saccular Aneurysm
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objective: Preservation of the inferior mesenteric artery (IMA) during endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) is necessary for prevention of mesenteric ischaemia in the case of chronically occluded coeliac and superior mesenteric arteries (SMA). This case report presents an approach in a complex patient. Methods: A 74 year old man with hepatitis C cirrhosis and recent non-ST elevation myocardial infarction presented with an infrarenal degenerating saccular aneurysm (58 mm), chronically occluded SMA and coeliac artery, and 9 mm IMA with high grade ostial stenosis. He also had concomitant atherosclerosis of the aorta with a narrow distal aortic lumen of 14 mm, which tapered to 11 mm at the aortic bifurcation. Endovascular attempts to cross long segment occlusions of the SMA and coeliac artery were unsuccessful. Thus, EVAR was performed using the unibody AFX2 endograft and chimney revascularisation of the IMA using a VBX stent graft. One year follow up demonstrated regression of the aneurysm sac to 53 mm with patent IMA graft and no endoleak. Conclusion: Few reports have described techniques for endovascular preservation of the IMA, which is a necessary consideration in the context of coeliac and SMA occlusion. Because open surgery was not a good option for this patient, available endovascular options had to be weighed up. An added challenge was the exceptionally narrow aortic lumen in the context of aortic and iliac atherosclerotic disease. It was decided that the anatomy was prohibitive for a fenestrated design and extensive calcification was too limiting for gate cannulation of a modular graft. Thus a bifurcated unibody aortic endograft with chimney stent grafting of the IMA was successfully used as a definitive solution.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".