MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4377103551 · doi:10.1016/j.jscai.2023.100953

E-42 | Multi-Center Clinical Outcomes of a No-Implant Interatrial Shunt for Heart Failure With Preserved and Reduced Ejection Fraction: Six-Month Outcomes from the ALLEVIATE-HF Feasibility Program

2023· article· en· W4377103551 on OpenAlexaff
Molly Szerlip, Gerard Wilkins, Benjamin J. Wilkins, Robert Gooley, Siobahn Lockwood, Brian J. Potter, Colin M. Barker, Peter Fail, Christopher Meduri, Kari Feldt, Darrell Solet, Jacob Kriegel, Tamaz Shaburishvili

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCongenital Heart Disease Studies
Canadian institutionsCentre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineCardiologyInternal medicineHeart failureEjection fractionHeart failure with preserved ejection fractionShunt (medical)ImplantInteratrial septumSurgeryAtrial fibrillation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Chronic heart failure (HFpEF and HFrEF) remains an important area of unmet need despite current best medical therapies available. Implantable interatrial shunt devices may improve quality of life and functional capacity with favorable safety signals but require permanent implantation to maintain patency. We report the 6-month clinical outcomes of a no-implant approach to interatrial shunting across three studies: ALLEVIATE-HF-1 and ALLEVIATE-HF-2 for HFpEF, and a dedicated HFrEF study. Patients aged ≥ 40 years, NYHA class II, III or ambulatory IV with elevated peak exercise PCWP were included in the study. Baseline screening included echocardiography, exercise right heart catheterization, KCCQ, and 6MWT. Femoral access was utilized and following transseptal puncture, the Alleviant System was used to excise a segment of the interatrial septum using a pulse of radiofrequency energy to create an interatrial shunt. Procedures were performed with fluoroscopic and echo guidance. A total of 28 HFpEF and 5 HFrEF patients were enrolled. Mean LVEF was 60 ± 8% and 30 ± 8% in HFpEF and HFrEF patients, respectively. Procedures were successful with no device or procedure-related adverse events. By 6 months, NT-proBNP was reduced by -372 ± 857 pg/ml (p=0.036) in HFpEF patients and -558 ± 139 pg/ml (p=0.004) in HFrEF patients; 6MWT distance increased by +101 ± 71 m (p<0.001) in HFpEF patients and +151 ± 76 m (p=0.029) in HFrEF patients; KCCQ overall summary score increased by 26 ± 19 points (p<0.001) in HFpEF patients and 19 ± 5 points (p=0.003) in HFrEF patients. TTE and CT confirmed all shunts assessed maintained patency (n=30). No device or procedure-related serious adverse events occurred upon discharge and through 6 months. This early feasibility clinical experience demonstrates procedural safety and feasibility of the Alleviant no-implant interatrial shunt creation with a promising efficacy signal through 6 months in patients with HFpEF and HFrEF. Enrollment for the forthcoming randomized sham-controlled pivotal study (ALLAY-HF) is anticipated to begin early 2023.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (broad)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.194
Threshold uncertainty score0.886

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.123
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.075
GPT teacher head0.371
Teacher spread0.296 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & InterventionsSame topicCongenital Heart Disease StudiesFrench-language works237,207