MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4377136930 · doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e16421

Seeking a better understanding of the non-receptor tyrosine kinase, SRMS

2023· review· en· W4377136930 on OpenAlexafffund
Raghuveera Kumar Goel, Nayoung Kim, Kiven Erique Lukong

Bibliographic record

VenueHeliyon · 2023
Typereview
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
Topic14-3-3 protein interactions
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
FundersCollege of Medicine, Catholic University of KoreaNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchCanadian Cancer SocietyCure Brain Cancer FoundationUniversity of Saskatchewan
KeywordsProto-oncogene tyrosine-protein kinase SrcReceptor tyrosine kinaseTyrosine kinaseKinaseBiologyCell biologyTyrosineSignal transductionBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

SRMS (Src-Related kinase lacking C-terminal regulatory tyrosine and N-terminal Myristoylation Sites) is a non-receptor tyrosine kinase first reported in a 1994 screen for genes regulating murine neural precursor cells. SRMS, pronounced "Shrims", lacks the C-terminal regulatory tyrosine critical for the regulation of the enzymatic activity of Src-family kinases (SFKs). Another remarkable characteristic of SRMS is its localization into distinct SRMS cytoplasmic punctae (SCPs) or GREL (Goel Raghuveera-Erique Lukong) bodies, a pattern not observed in the SFKs. This unique subcellular localization of SRMS could dictate its cellular targets, proteome, and potentially, substrates. However, the function of SRMS is still relatively unknown. Further, how is its activity regulated and by what cellular targets? Studies have emerged highlighting the potential role of SRMS in autophagy and in regulating the activation of BRK/PTK6. Potential novel cellular substrates have also been identified, including DOK1, vimentin, Sam68, FBKP51, and OTUB1. Recent studies have also demonstrated the potential role of the kinase in various cancers, including gastric and colorectal cancers and platinum resistance in ovarian cancer. This review discusses the advancements made in SRMS-related biology to date and the path to understanding the cellular and physiological significance of the kinase.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.003
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.070
GPT teacher head0.333
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHeliyonSame topic14-3-3 protein interactionsFrench-language works237,207