Differential responses from the left postcentral gyrus, right middle frontal gyrus, and precuneus to meal ingestion in patients with functional dyspepsia
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background Functional dyspepsia (FD) is most often a meal-induced syndrome. Studies using resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (rs-fMRI) reported abnormal connectivity in areas related to pain processing in FD. However, only a few studies have attempted to determine how meal ingestion affects the brain's working patterns. Through rs-fMRI, this study observed how meal ingestion affected brain regions related to visceral hypersensitivity and emotional response networks in FD patients. Methods A total of 30 FD patients and 32 healthy controls (HC) were enrolled and underwent clinical investigations. Rs-fMRI was performed twice after a 4-h fast and 50 min after a meal. The mean functional connectivity strength (FCS) values were extracted from brain regions with significant differences to show the trend of changes related to meal ingestion after FCS analyses. Results Depression, anxiety, sleep disturbances, and weight loss were more common in FD patients (P ≤ 0.001). Compared with HCs (corrected cluster P-value < 0.05), FD patients had significantly higher FCS in the right middle frontal gyrus before meals and higher meal-induced FCS in the left postcentral gyrus. HCs had greater meal-induced activation in the right precuneus and anterior cingulate cortex. FD patients had a decreasing trend in the right inferior frontal gyrus compared to the increasing trend in HCs. We only found anxiety to be negatively correlated with FCS in the right inferior frontal gyrus in FD (r = −0.459, p = 0.048, uncorrected). Conclusions In this study, we discovered that FD patients have different perceptual and emotional responses to food intake in defined brain areas, providing promising impetus for understanding pathogenic brain mechanisms in FD.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".