MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4377140673 · doi:10.1177/01423312231171473

Decentralized event-triggered resilient control for a class of networked control systems under denial-of-service attacks

2023· article· en· W4377140673 on OpenAlexaff
Amir Torabi, Jafar Zarei, Mehrdad Saif

Bibliographic record

VenueTransactions of the Institute of Measurement and Control · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSmart Grid Security and Resilience
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Windsor
Fundersnot available
KeywordsControl theory (sociology)Denial-of-service attackDecentralised systemNoise (video)Benchmark (surveying)Computer scienceStability (learning theory)Networked control systemActuatorTransmission (telecommunications)JammingControl (management)Control engineeringEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper studies the problem of resilient dynamic output-feedback control schemes for continuous-time networked control systems (NCSs). A decentralized hybrid strategy is utilized while network imperfections, external disturbances, and noise are considered. Moreover, during data transmission, a practical denial-of-service (DoS) jamming attack, which periodically disturbs the network channels, is considered. To preserve the network resources, a decentralized event-triggered mechanism is employed to transmit only the sampled signals that are required. It is assumed that outputs and control inputs of each subsystem are transmitted to the corresponding decentralized controllers and actuators, respectively, over the different individual channels based on independent triggering mechanisms. At first, the NCS is modeled as a decentralized hybrid system with exogenous disturbance and noise. Then, sufficient conditions that guarantee the [Formula: see text]-stability of the NCS in the presence of external disturbances and noise, which is resilient to periodic DoS attacks, are provided in terms of the linear matrix inequalities. Finally, sufficient conditions are derived to deal with the time-varying delays. It has been demonstrated that the proposed technique can be effectively applied to a well-known continuous stirred tank reactor (CSTR) as a benchmark example.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.641
Threshold uncertainty score0.613

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTransactions of the Institute of Measurement and ControlSame topicSmart Grid Security and ResilienceFrench-language works237,207