MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Case-control virtual histology elucidates cell types associated with cortical thickness differences in Alzheimer's disease

2023· article· en· W4377157570 on OpenAlexafffund
Isabel Kerrebijn, Michael Wainberg, Peter Zhukovsky, Yuxiao Chen, Melanie Davie, Daniel Felsky, Shreejoy J. Tripathy

Bibliographic record

VenueNeuroImage · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicSingle-cell and spatial transcriptomics
Canadian institutionsPublic Health OntarioUniversity of TorontoCentre for Addiction and Mental Health
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaKrembil FoundationCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchKavli Foundation
KeywordsCell typeNeuroscienceBiologyCerebral cortexPhenotypeGene expressionAlzheimer's diseaseCellPathologyDiseaseGeneMedicineGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Many neuropsychiatric disorders are characterised by altered cortical thickness, but the cell types underlying these changes remain largely unknown. Virtual histology (VH) approaches map regional patterns of gene expression with regional patterns of MRI-derived phenotypes, such as cortical thickness, to identify cell types associated with case-control differences in those MRI measures. However, this method does not incorporate valuable information of case-control differences in cell type abundance. We developed a novel method, termed case-control virtual histology (CCVH), and applied it to Alzheimer's disease (AD) and dementia cohorts. Leveraging a multi-region gene expression dataset of AD cases (n = 40) and controls (n = 20), we quantified AD case-control differential expression of cell type-specific markers across 13 brain regions. We then correlated these expression effects with MRI-derived AD case-control cortical thickness differences across the same regions. Cell types with spatially concordant AD-related effects were identified through resampling marker correlation coefficients. Among regions thinner in AD, gene expression patterns identified by CCVH suggested fewer excitatory and inhibitory neurons, and greater proportions of astrocytes, microglia, oligodendrocytes, oligodendrocyte precursor cells, and endothelial cells in AD cases vs. controls. In contrast, original VH identified expression patterns suggesting that excitatory but not inhibitory neuron abundance was associated with thinner cortex in AD, despite the fact that both types of neurons are known to be lost in the disorder. Compared to original VH, cell types identified through CCVH are more likely to directly underlie cortical thickness differences in AD. Sensitivity analyses suggest our results are largely robust to specific analysis choices, like numbers of cell type-specific marker genes used and background gene sets used to construct null models. As more multi-region brain expression datasets become available, CCVH will be useful for identifying the cellular correlates of cortical thickness across neuropsychiatric illnesses.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.611
Threshold uncertainty score0.601

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNeuroImageSame topicSingle-cell and spatial transcriptomicsFrench-language works237,207