Developmental and genetic basis of the androgynophore in <i>Gynandropsis gynandra</i>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
PREMISE: Flowering plants have evolved a vast array of floral features involved in plant-pollinator interactions. A feature that seemingly increases the chance of pollen transfer is the androgynophore, a stalk-like structure that raises the reproductive organs of the flower. However, little is known about the developmental and genetic basis of this structure despite its presence in multiple, distantly related taxa. Here, we address this gap by investigating Gynandropsis gynandra (Cleomaceae), a species with a prominent androgynophore. METHODS: We combined morphological and anatomical analyses with a comparative transcriptomic study to provide a detailed description of the androgynophore throughout development, examine global gene expression patterns, and identify candidate genes putatively involved in androgynophore elongation. RESULTS: The radially symmetric androgynophore of G. gynandra rapidly lengthens primarily via cell elongation. Despite its structural uniformity, androgynophore development is characterized by complex gene expression patterns including differential expression of floral organ identity genes and genes associated with organ development and growth in Arabidopsis thaliana. CONCLUSIONS: Our morphological characterizations and high-quality transcriptome for G. gynandra suggest that the androgynophore is a novel structure formed via elaboration of both the receptacle and base of reproductive organs because it is structurally like an elongated internode but expresses the genetic repertoire typically associated with the reproductive organs. The drastic increase in cell length and uniform structure elevates the androgynophore as a potentially powerful model for cell elongation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".