Bibliographic record
Abstract
Alice Munro, the contemporary Canadian English-language writer who proved the importance of the short story as a genre by receiving the Nobel Prize in 2013, is undoubtedly an interesting author in terms of researching women's narrative. Although most of Munro's stories are set in the Harron Country, by using those regional features, customs, and traditions, Munro creates universal texts just like William Faulkner and Flannery O'Connor of his time. Like Faulkner and O'Connor, Munro's characters often confront deep-rooted and time-worn customs or traditions, but Munro's characters' reactions are generally less severe than those of his Southern counterparts. In addition, Munro's male characters are of one type, monotonous and boring, while female characters are more complex, peculiar and distinctive. The present paper analyses Alice Munro's short story collection Runaway (2004), paying particular attention to the title story. The collection consists of eight short stories. The main unifier of the stories about women of seemingly different ages and statuses is the desire to escape, which is caused by various reasons (unhappy marriage, family problems, running away from a provincial town in search of adventure). It is also interesting that the second, third and fourth stories of the collection tell about the same character, Juliet, and different episodes and stages of her life, which Pedro Almadovar even made into a movie in 2016. While Munro divides the story of "Juliet" into three independent stories, but united by the main character, the eighth story of the collection is in five parts and covers the life of the main character, Nancy. This decision of Munro is not accidental, and with this action, he once again emphasizes the innovations he brought to the genre of the story.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".