MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4377239271 · doi:10.1093/jsxmed/qdad060.280

(300) Impact of Intranasal Testosterone versus Intramuscular Testosterone cypionate on Hematocrit of Hypogonadal Men: Data from an ongoing Phase IV, Open-label, Randomized Clinical Trial.

2023· article· en· W4377239271 on OpenAlexaff
Parris Diaz, Jesse Ory, J Loloi, Ari Bernstein, Rubén Blachman-Braun, Montserrat Rivero, Akhil Muthigi, Ranjith Ramasamy

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Sexual Medicine · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHormonal and reproductive studies
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHematocritTestosterone (patch)MedicineRandomized controlled trialInternal medicineAdverse effectUrologyEndocrinology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Introduction The potential increase in hematocrit and subsequent risk of polycythemia has been regarded as one of the most worrisome adverse effects of testosterone therapy (TT). Recent evidence has shown that the modality of delivery and half-life of each formulation may affect the incidence of these side effects. Therefore, we hypothesized that longer-acting intramuscular testosterone would increase hematocrit to a higher degree than the shorter-acting nasal formulations that can more closely mimic normal physiology. Objective To compare the effects of Intranasal Testosterone (NT) and Intramuscular Testosterone (TC) on hematocrit and serum testosterone levels in testosterone deficient men over 4 months. Methods This Phase IV, randomized, open-label clinical trial was performed on 39 symptomatic, testosterone deficient (TD) men with at least two serum testosterone levels below 300 ng/dL drawn before 10AM. Men were randomized (1:1) to receive either nasal gel three times per day (5.5mg per nostril) and intramuscular TC (200mg) once every two weeks. The primary outcomes were changes in Hematocrit and serum T before and after four months. Secondary outcomes were changes in estradiol (E), PSA and 17-OHP. Data analysis was performed using two-sample and single-sample T tests (Microsoft Excel v.16.60). Results A total of 39 men with testosterone deficiency were randomized to receive either NT (n=15) or TC (n=24). The median participant age was 46 years old with a mean serum T of 237.1 ng/dL and hematocrit of 43.3%. Prevalence of participants who screened positive for OSA on STOP-BANG questionnaire for NT and TC group were 67% and 71%, respectively. Compared to their respective baselines, men in both groups saw significantly increased serum testosterone levels (p 52%) after 4 months was 0% in NT group and 4.2% in TC. Those taking TC saw increases in E (p=0.003) and decreases in 17-OHP (p<0.001) at follow-up, where NT saw no changes. Neither regimen significantly impacted PSA at follow-up. Conclusions Both Intranasal and Intramuscular testosterone regimens are effective in treating hypogonadal men. However, short-acting nasal T does not appear to impact hematocrit levels especially when compared to testosterone cypionate. Those who are at increased risk of developing polycythemia or want to avoid changes in their E or 17-OHP levels may benefit from short-acting T formulations. Disclosure Yes, this is sponsored by industry/sponsor: Acerus Pharmaceuticals Clarification Industry funding only - investigator initiated and executed study Any of the authors act as a consultant, employee or shareholder of an industry for: Acerus Pharmaceuticals

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.021

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.321
GPT teacher head0.506
Teacher spread0.185 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Sexual MedicineSame topicHormonal and reproductive studiesFrench-language works237,207