Potential of cyclodextrins-based formulations in the control of the date moth Ectomyelois ceratoniae (Pyralidae)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Recently essential oils (EOs) encapsulation is experiencing growing applications in the agricultural and agri-food sector. Encapsulation is reported as safe environmental technology leading to a reduction of conventional insecticides use. This study concerns the assessment of fumigant toxicity and persistence of Rosmarinus officinalis EO encapsulated in two cyclodextrins β-CD and HP-β-CD against larvae of the date moth, Ectomyelois ceratoniae. The retention capacity, encapsulation efficacy, loading capacity and release behavior of the two inclusion complexes were investigated. The results showed that the encapsulation efficiency of HP-β-CD (EE = 25.25%) was higher than that of β-CD (EE = 17.73%). Additionally, compared to crude EO, the in vitro release profile of the two inclusion complexes showed a slow and sustained release. (0.0009 and 0.0007 min − 1 for β-CD and HP-β-CD, respectively). After 30 days of exposure, the larval mortality rates for HP-β-CD/EO and β-CD/EO inclusion complexes were 40.38 and 53.85%, respectively. Furthermore, the half-life of HP-β-CD and β-CD/EO inclusion complexes (9.620 and 8.045 days) was significantly longer than that of the crude EO (5.245days). This study supports the use of cyclodextrins, mainly HP-β-CD, in the date industry for the control of insect pests.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".