Bibliographic record
Abstract
This book represents a homecoming of sorts.Growing up in Lennoxville, Quebec, and attending Bishop's University as an undergraduate, I constantly encountered physical reminders of its Anglican past: the Gothic splendour of McGreer Hall, the English collegiate style of St Mark's Chapel, and the names of Mountain and Nicolls, which still adorn its buildings.As one walks through the campuses of either Bishop's University or Bishop's College School, it does not take much imagination to conjure up images of a British imperial heritage transferred to the rural landscape of Quebec's Eastern Townships.And yet little appears to remain of the spiritual vision that sustained the founders of these schools.It is my hope that this study has succeeded in recapturing the essence not only of their High Churchmanship but also of their opponents' Evangelicalism.My scholarly work over the past twenty years has attempted to explore various facets of Anglo-American religious culture.My historical mentors, Hereward Senior and the late W. Stanford Reid, were at ease in both Britain and British America, and they instilled in me a desire to see the connections that suffused this Atlantic world.In bringing this work to completion, I have benefited enormously from the advice and encouragement of a number of historians.I shall always remember with fondness the many stimulating conversations discussing British history that I had over coffee with the late Philip Lawson.In inviting me to participate in the Queen's Conference on Aspects of the Canadian Evangelical Experience, the late George Rawlyk gave encouragement to the present project.He and David Priestley commented
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.583 | 0.370 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".