MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4377260137 · doi:10.1515/9780773571358-004

Prologue

2003· book-chapter· en· W4377260137 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueMcGill-Queen's University Press eBooks · 2003
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersKillam TrustsSocial Sciences and Humanities Research Council of CanadaMcGill University
KeywordsPrologueHistoryArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Stauffenberg brothers were all born in the first decade of the twentieth century.As children and adolescents they were strongly influenced by three distinct elements in their background.First there was the family, with its traditional forms and values, its estates in Swabia and Franconia, its connections with the royal court of Wiirttemberg in Stuttgart, its tradition of service to the state.Second, the spirit and teaching of their school, with its emphasis on the classics; third, the world of poetry and poets.Before all else came the service of the fatherland: as Bismarck once remarked, with the brevity that was sufficient to convey his meaning to like-minded contemporaries, there was no reason why the sons of Prussian farmers should be shot in a cause that was not Prussia's, but 'I am not speaking of the nobleman, he was born for that.' 1 However, under the National Socialist dictatorship, between 1933 and 1945, the Stauffenberg brothers, faced with crimes unparalleled in the history of mankind, were forced by their profession and their external circumstances to adopt a far more questioning attitude towards the past and present of their own nation.What road brought Claus, Count von Stauffenberg, to the sandpile in the courtyard of the Berlin War Ministry where he was shot, and his brother, Berthold, to the hook on which he was strangled in the execution hut of Plötzensee Prison?What is the meaning of these sacrifices, and of the anguish of the survivors -the surviving brother, the mother, widows and children?A number of difficulties lie in wait for those who seek to become familiar with the Stauffenberg brothers.They were extraordinarily unlike their contemporaries -in their own families, in the nobility, within the Catholic community, in their school, in their professions.This fact emerges strongly from the primary sources.The more closely a witness was acquainted with the Stauffenbergs, the more cautious he was in describing them, in uttering judgements beyond respect, admiration, and acknowledgement of the extraordinary in them.This was particularly true for Claus and his whole, harmonious personality.The less well a witness knew the Stauffenbergs, the more his evidence reflects his own limitations.There is an almost complete xv

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.447
Threshold uncertainty score0.000

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.004
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.5530.384

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.205
Teacher spread0.185 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueMcGill-Queen's University Press eBooks→French-language works237,207→