MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4377290856 · doi:10.1016/j.dcn.2023.101258

The development of functional connectivity within the dorsal striatum from early childhood to adulthood

2023· article· en· W4377290856 on OpenAlexafffund
Eun Jung Choi, Marlee M. Vandewouw, Kathrina de Villa, Takeshi Inoue, Margot J. Taylor

Bibliographic record

VenueDevelopmental Cognitive Neuroscience · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicTranscranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
Canadian institutionsSickKids FoundationUniversity of TorontoHospital for Sick Children
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsPsychologyStriatumDorsumFunctional connectivityNeuroscienceVentral striatumDevelopmental psychologyCognitive psychologyDopamineAnatomyBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Dorsal striatum, principally comprising of caudate and putamen, is well-known to support motor function but also various higher-order cognitive functions. This is enabled by developing short- and long-range connections to distributed cortical regions throughout the life span, but few studies have examined developmental changes from young children to adults in the same cohort. Here we investigated the development of dorsal-striatal network in a large (n = 476), single-site sample of healthy subjects 3-42 years of age in three groups (children, adolescence, adults). The results showed that the connectivity within the striatum and to sensorimotor regions was established at an early stage of life and remained strong in adolescence, supporting that sensory-seeking behaviours and habit formation are important learning mechanisms during the developmental periods. This connectivity diminished with age, as many behaviours become more efficient and automated. Adolescence demonstrated a remarkable transition phase where the connectivity to dorsolateral prefrontal cortex emerged but connectivity to the dorsomedial prefrontal and posterior brain, which belong to the ventral attentional and default mode networks, was only seen in adults. This prolonged maturation in between-network integration may explain the behavioural characteristics of adolescents in that they exhibit elaborated cognitive performance but also demonstrate high risk-taking behaviours.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.058
GPT teacher head0.275
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations30
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDevelopmental Cognitive NeuroscienceSame topicTranscranial Magnetic Stimulation StudiesFrench-language works237,207