MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4377291332 · doi:10.9734/jamb/2023/v23i6729

In-vitro and In-vivo Anti-Candidal Effect of Cnidoscolus aconitifolius Leaves Extracts

2023· article· en· W4377291332 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Advances in Microbiology · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicScientific Research and Studies
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCandida parapsilosisCandida tropicalisCandida kruseiCandida albicansIn vivoCandida glabrataMicrobiologyBiologyTraditional medicineCorpus albicansAntimicrobialAgar diffusion testMedicineBacteriaBiotechnologyAntibacterial activity

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Candidiasis is an opportunistic infection caused by pathogens of the genus Candida. Due to the increase in antifungal resistance by Candida species, there is a need for alternatives in its treatment. Cnidoscolus aconitifolius is a medicinal plant with vast nutritional and antimicrobial properties. This study evaluated the in-vitro and in-vivo anti-candidal effect of Cnidoscolus aconitifolius (spinach tree) leaves extract. Clinical isolates of Candida albicans, Candida krusei, Candida tropicalis, Candida dublinensis, Candida glabrata, and Candida parapsilosis were used in this study and Cold maceration technique was employed in the plant extraction process, to obtain its ethanolic, methanolic, and aqueous extract. The agar well diffusion method and 2-fold dilution process -to obtain 250 mg/ml to 15.625mg/ml of the extracts -were used for the antimicrobial sensitivity test and three weeks old female Wistar rats infected with 20µl of standardized C. albicans were used for the in-vivo evaluation. Statistical analysis was done using Statistical package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 22. In-vitro assay revealed ethanolic extract as the most potent extract with the highest inhibition zone diameter of 12.67±1.15c, 11.67±1.15c, and 12.33±0.58c at 250mg/ml against C. tropicalis, C. krusei2, and C. parapsilosis respectively. C. parapsilosis was the most sensitive to all the extracts. In-vivo, the disappearance of disease symptoms and progressive decrease in rats Candida burden- from 6.35×103 CFU/ml obtained after infection to 2.15×103CFU/ml after treatment revealed the ability of the plant to treat candidiasis. The study suggests that extract of Cnidoscolus aconitifolius leaves could act individually or synergistically as effective drug candidates in the treatment of candidiasis; thus if its individual antifungal constituents are purified, this plant could be the next major anti-candidal agent.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.140
Threshold uncertainty score0.267

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.292
Teacher spread0.285 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it