Learning binary and sparse permutation-invariant representations for fast and memory efficient whole slide image search
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Considering their gigapixel sizes, the representation of whole slide images (WSIs) for classification and retrieval systems is a non-trivial task. Patch processing and multi-Instance Learning (MIL) are common approaches to analyze WSIs. However, in end-to-end training, these methods require high GPU memory consumption due to the simultaneous processing of multiple sets of patches. Furthermore, compact WSI representations through binary and/or sparse representations are urgently needed for real-time image retrieval within large medical archives. To address these challenges, we propose a novel framework for learning compact WSI representations utilizing deep conditional generative modeling and the Fisher Vector Theory. The training of our method is instance-based, achieving better memory and computational efficiency during the training. To achieve efficient large-scale WSI search, we introduce new loss functions, namely gradient sparsity and gradient quantization losses, for learning sparse and binary permutation-invariant WSI representations called Conditioned Sparse Fisher Vector (C-Deep-SFV), and Conditioned Binary Fisher Vector (C-Deep-BFV). The learned WSI representations are validated on the largest public WSI archive, The Cancer Genomic Atlas (TCGA) and also Liver-Kidney-Stomach (LKS) dataset. For WSI search, the proposed method outperforms Yottixel and Gaussian Mixture Model (GMM)-based Fisher Vector both in terms of retrieval accuracy and speed. For WSI classification, we achieve competitive performance against state-of-art on lung cancer data from TCGA and the public benchmark LKS dataset.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".