<scp>Melvyn New</scp> and <scp>Anthony W Lee</scp> (eds). <i>Notes on Footnotes: Annotating Eighteenth-Century Literature</i>
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Journal Article Melvyn New and Anthony W Lee (eds). Notes on Footnotes: Annotating Eighteenth-Century Literature Get access Melvyn New and Anthony W Lee (eds). Notes on Footnotes: Annotating Eighteenth-Century Literature. Pp. xiv + 254. University Park, PA: The Pennsylvania State University Press, 2023. Hardback, $119.95. Thomas Keymer Thomas Keymer University of Toronto, Canada Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar The Review of English Studies, hgad056, https://doi.org/10.1093/res/hgad056 Published: 23 May 2023 Article history Received: 14 April 2023 Editorial decision: 10 May 2023 Accepted: 11 May 2023 Corrected and typeset: 23 May 2023 Published: 23 May 2023
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.010 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it