MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4377694465 · doi:10.1353/ail.2022.0016

From the Editor

2022· article· en· W4377694465 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Kiara M. Vigil

Bibliographic record

VenueStudies in American Indian Literatures · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicIndigenous Health, Education, and Rights
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIndigenousHonorPublicationColonialismPoliticsMedia studiesDiversity (politics)OppressionSociologyResource (disambiguation)Style (visual arts)NegotiationHistoryPolitical scienceGender studiesSocial scienceLawAnthropology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

From the Editor Kiara M. Vigil Haŋ mitakuyepi (Greetings, my relatives), It is an honor for me to guide the publication of SAIL as its new editor. Along with new interventions and insights, the articles in this issue represent a stylistic change as we are now asking authors to submit abstracts, keywords, and to follow the Chicago Manual of Style’s guidelines using endnotes. These changes reflect some of the best practices used by other leading journals that publish work primarily within Native American and Indigenous studies. The addition of abstracts and keywords will also make it easier for other researchers to connect with the work that is being published by SAIL. The articles in this issue represent topics and interdisciplinary methods that scholars of Indigenous literatures, broadly conceived, are using in arguments that engage deeply with Indigenous women’s writings, politics, and performance as well as bodies, lands, and topics that have transnational and hemispheric dimensions. From public art, to theater, to place-based storytellers and stories that include Abiayala and Canada as well as Turtle Island, many of the authors featured in this issue are engaging with questions and theories that concern experiences of trauma due to resource extraction, violence against women, and other forms of exploitation and oppression that are linked to ongoing colonial policies and practices. Despite this range and diversity, the arrangement of the articles in this issue aims to showcase powerful moments of intersection where these authors speak to one another, in relation to land and bodies, gender and performance, and also home and sovereignty. This curated constellation of scholarship offers readers an opportunity to appreciate each article on its own while also connecting these contributors to one another in new and impactful ways as they read the issue in its entirety. [End Page vii] The interdisciplinary methods that many of these authors use are worth highlighting as readers are tasked with thinking about literature in relation to art installations, in the case of Isabella Huberman’s “From the Floodland: Stories of Hydro in Eeyou Istchee,” which brings together two stories about water and land. These stories highlight the “hydro-colonial dispossession” that Huberman contends enable us to focus on the ongoing relationships with the dead. Bringing together literature and public art, Huberman’s analysis emphasizes the power of place-based connections to those who have been lost while attending to what these works share in regard to the histories and persistence of colonial resource extraction. Another powerful work that brings together law and drama through interpretations of two plays, by lawyer–dramatist Mary Kathryn Nagle, is Cathy Waegner’s “Performing Justice in Recent Native American Women’s Theater: Mary Kathryn Nagle’s Sovereignty and Manahatta.” Waegner theorizes performative sovereignty and the power of restorative justice, noting how Nagle’s plays transform received modes of perceiving and staging Native America in the twenty-first century. Focusing on examples of Indigenous women’s theater, Waegner argues that Nagle’s Sovereignty and Manahatta provide experimental representations of time, focusing on the strength of women and the pain of Western-based hegemonic practices. Shelli Rottschafer’s analytical framework centers place-based querencia as a means to reclaim what was lost due to trauma caused by displacement, in her reading of Kali Fajardo-Anstine’s short stories “Sugar Babies” and “Ghost Sickness.” Reclamations of traditional knowledges are made possible despite experiences of poverty and displacement, and as such, craft new spaces for healing and revitalization. Rottschafer’s work emphasizes the overlaps and productive edges of Indigenous and Chicanx community formations and identities with regard to how writers, like Fajardo-Anstine, are able to speak out against prejudice, institutionalized racism, and use their ‘querencia’ as a tool for social justice. Ultimately, Rottschafer’s article highlights reconciliation through storytelling and argues that both “Sugar Babies” and “Ghost Sickness” provide readers with traditional ecological knowledge and a more inclusive approach to understanding the past as well as the present of nation building. Like Rottschafer, Tiffany Miller’s “Decolonial Ch’owen across Abiayala and Turtle Island: Calixta Gabriel Xiquín’s Poetic Invocations of [End Page viii] Kaqchikel Spirituality, the Cardinal Points, and Trans-Indigenous Grandmothers” enables readers to engage with Indigenous...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.034
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: Editorial
Teacher disagreement score0.262
Threshold uncertainty score0.875

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.034
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0100.006
Open science0.0020.004
Research integrity0.0050.008
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.2620.192

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.343
Teacher spread0.330 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEditorial

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueStudies in American Indian LiteraturesSame topicIndigenous Health, Education, and RightsFrench-language works237,207