Deep Learning Based Parameterization of Diffeomorphic Image Registration for Cardiac Image Segmentation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cardiac segmentation from magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is one of the essential tasks in analyzing the anatomy and function of the heart for the assessment and diagnosis of cardiac diseases. However, cardiac MRI generates hundreds of images per scan, and manual annotation of them is challenging and time-consuming, and therefore processing these images automatically is of interest. This study proposes a novel end-to-end supervised cardiac MRI segmentation framework based on a diffeomorphic deformable registration that can segment cardiac chambers from 2D and 3D images or volumes. To represent actual cardiac deformation, the method parameterizes the transformation using radial and rotational components computed via deep learning, with a set of paired images and segmentation masks used for training. The formulation guarantees transformations that are invertible and prevents mesh folding, which is essential for preserving the topology of the segmentation results. A physically plausible transformation is achieved by employing diffeomorphism in computing the transformations and activation functions that constrain the range of the radial and rotational components. The method was evaluated over three different data sets and showed significant improvements compared to exacting learning and non-learning based methods in terms of the Dice score and Hausdorff distance metrics.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".