<i>Tragopogon pratensis</i>: Multiple introductions to North America, circumscription, and the formation of the allotetraploid <i>T. miscellus</i>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Tragopogon (Asteraceae) includes two recently and repeatedly formed allopolyploids, T. mirus and T. miscellus , both of which formed in western North America following the human‐mediated introduction of three diploids from Europe: T. dubius , T. porrifolius , and T. pratensis . We recently investigated the genetics of the introduction history to North America of T. dubius , the shared parent of both allopolyploids. Here, we investigate the introduction of T. pratensis into North America, the second diploid parent of T. miscellus . Using ITS sequence data, we found that T. pratensis as currently defined in the narrow sense is polyphyletic and comprises at least four different major ITS types in its native range. Of these native range ITS patterns, two have been introduced from Europe into North America and now occur widely across Canada and the U.S.A. Although the allotetraploid T. miscellus formed multiple times in western North America, only one of these ITS types was involved in the recurrent formations. These results for T. pratensis parallel our findings for T. dubius and further suggest that not all genotypes of these two species may be able to participate in the formation of allopolyploids. Our phylogenetic analyses reveal that several entities traditionally considered part of T. pratensis in the narrow sense are genetically distinct and mark unique lineages that may ultimately merit recognition as separate species. This proclivity for genetically distinct entities (potential cryptic species) within species recognized based on morphology appears common in Tragopogon . To unravel the complexities of what is referred to as “ T. pratensis ”, more intensive phylogenetic analyses involving many more samples from across the geographic range of the species are required, as are detailed assessments of taxonomy, morphology, and cytology.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".