Socio-Demographic and Clinical Profile of Pediatric Patients whoConsulted At the Out-Patient Department of A Psychiatric Facilityin Southern Philippines from 2015 To 2019
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to describe the sociodemographic and clinical profile of pediatric patients who consulted at the Out-Patient Department of a psychiatric facility in Davao City, ie. Southern Philippines Medical Center Institute of Psychiatry and Behavioral Medicine and provide baseline data for future research and program development. Methodology: This is a descriptive chart review that used a purposive sampling method to determine the sociodemographic and clinical profile of patients below nineteen (19) years old, seen at the Out-Patient Department of a psychiatric facility from January 2015 to December 2019. Results: A total of 427 charts were reviewed in this study. Majority (30.2%) of the study population had their first consult in 2019, female (56%), belonged to the 12-18 age group (64%), and had high school education (43%). Most came from Davao Region (89%) with class D social classification (64%). The clinical profile showed that majority consulted due to forensic reasons (54%), with referrals coming from WCPU, courts, or police stations (54%). Sexual abuse (43.9%) was the most common cause for forensic consult. The most common diagnosis was clustered under Adverse Childhood Experiences (30%). Most were advised referral to the psychology unit (59%) and were discharged as Out-patient (97%). Conclusion: The number of child and adolescent consults in the Out-Patient Department of a psychiatric facility steadily increased within the span of five years. Majority of the patients came in for forensic reasons, with sexual abuse as the highest. A third of the consults were diagnosed to have Adverse Childhood Experience.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.009 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".