MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4377940798 · doi:10.26508/lsa.202302133

The CHARGE syndrome-associated protein FAM172A controls AGO2 nuclear import

2023· article· en· W4377940798 on OpenAlexafffund
Séphora Sallis, Félix‐Antoine Bérubé‐Simard, Benoı̂t Grondin, Elizabeth H. Leduc, Fatiha Azouz, Catherine Bélanger, Nicolas Pilon

Bibliographic record

VenueLife Science Alliance · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCongenital Ear and Nasal Anomalies
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalUniversité du Québec à Montréal
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaGovernment of CanadaFonds de Recherche du Québec - SantéUniversité du Québec à Montréal
KeywordsChromatinImportinBiologyGeneticsCell biologyRNA-binding proteinRNA splicingMutationNuclear export signalNuclear transportRNAGeneCell nucleus

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Alternative causes include mutation of other chromatin and/or splicing factors. One of these additional players is the poorly characterized FAM172A, which we previously found in a complex with CHD7 and the small RNA-binding protein AGO2 at the chromatin-spliceosome interface. Focusing on the FAM172A-AGO2 interplay, we now report that FAM172A is a direct binding partner of AGO2 and, as such, one of the long sought-after regulators of AGO2 nuclear import. We show that this FAM172A function mainly relies on its classical bipartite nuclear localization signal and associated canonical importin-α/β pathway, being enhanced by CK2-induced phosphorylation and abrogated by a CHARGE syndrome-associated missense mutation. Overall, this study thus strengthens the notion that noncanonical nuclear functions of AGO2 and associated regulatory mechanisms might be clinically relevant.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.804
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLife Science AllianceSame topicCongenital Ear and Nasal AnomaliesFrench-language works237,207