Impact of traffic-related air pollution on the blood pressure response to exercise in individuals with hypertension
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: Foundation. Main funding source(s): Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada and B.C. Sports & Exercise Medicine Research Foundation. Background The epidemiologic evidence suggests that the health benefits of exercise in healthy adults outweigh the adverse effects of air pollution in all but the most extreme concentrations. However, no studies have examined the acute response to exercise in air pollution in individuals with hypertension, a subgroup particularly susceptible to the cardiovascular effects of air population. Purpose The purpose of this study was to determine the impact of traffic-related air pollution on the acute cardiovascular response to exercise in patients with hypertension. We hypothesized that exposure to higher levels of traffic-related air pollution during exercise would attenuate, but not eliminate, acute post-exercise reductions in blood pressure and arterial stiffness. Methods Fourteen patients with hypertension (62.4±6.8 years; 81% male) completed a real-world, randomized, crossover study. Two 30-minute exercise bouts at 40-59% heart rate reserve were performed: once along a commercial street (high traffic) and once in an urban plaza (low traffic). Blood pressure (BP) and arterial stiffness (i.e., carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity [cfPWV]) were examined prior to, 30 minutes after, and 2 hours following exercise. 24-hour ambulatory BP monitoring was immediately completed following each visit. Black carbon, noise, relative humidity, and temperature were measured during each exercise bout (Figure 1). Results No differences were found for baseline cardiovascular measures between high and low traffic visits. At 30 minutes and 2 hours post-exercise, systolic BP was significantly reduced relative to baseline in the low-traffic condition only; diastolic BP was not significantly reduced at any timepoint. Based on linear mixed-effects analyses, exercising at the low traffic site was associated, relative to the high traffic site, with a significant (p = 0.04) reduction in systolic BP (-4.30 mm Hg [95% CI -8.09 to -0.54]) up to 2 hours following exercise after adjusting for exercise intensity, temperature, and noise; no differences were found for diastolic BP (-1.56 mm Hg [95% CI -4.87 to 1.83], p = 0.39). Each interquartile increase in black carbon (1168 ng/m³) was significantly associated with a 2.33 mm Hg (95% CI 0.37 to 4.17) increase in systolic BP up to 2 hours following exercise. No associations were observed between traffic site and BP for any ambulatory periods (i.e., 24-hour average, daytime, nighttime, or evening). The acute cfPWV response to exercise was also similar between traffic sites (p > 0.05). Conclusion Our findings suggest that exposure to traffic-related air pollution during exercise may adversely impact the beneficial short-term BP response to exercise in patients with hypertension. While the long-term implications of these changes to the acute BP response to exercise must be further explored, patients with hypertension can employ the prudent strategy of maximizing their distance from major roadways when exercising.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".