MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Leakage Current Analysis of Grid-Connected Transformerless Photovoltaic Energy Systems

2022· article· en· W4378070598 on OpenAlexaff
Harish Karneddi, Deepak Ronanki, Apparao Dekka

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMicrogrid Control and Optimization
Canadian institutionsLakehead University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhotovoltaic systemGalvanic isolationInverterTopology (electrical circuits)Electrical engineeringCommon-mode signalElectronic engineeringMATLABGridComputer scienceVoltageEngineeringTransformer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Transformerless inverters are now receiving increased attention in grid-connected solar photovoltaic (PV) systems due to requirements for high power density, efficiency, reliability, and affordability. However, the fluctuation of common-mode voltage between the PV neutral and grid results in leakage current being produced through the stray capacitance between the PV array and the ground. Furthermore, the transformerless inverters experience dc current injection and safety issues, and are prone to system degradation due to a lack of galvanic isolation between the inverter and the grid. This paper aims to provide a comparative analysis of the leakage current mitigation/elimination methods with a focus on proactive measures in the form of inverter topology modifications and/or modulation techniques in transformerless PV systems. The leakage current of each inverter topology is assessed holistically through simulation studies in MATLAB/Simulink software. Finally, the merits and demerits of each transformerless inverter topology with the developed modulation scheme are summarized.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.768
Threshold uncertainty score0.662

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.173
Teacher spread0.168 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMicrogrid Control and OptimizationFrench-language works237,207