Extracellular Polysaccharide Receptor and Receptor-Binding Proteins of the Rhodobacter capsulatus Bacteriophage-like Gene Transfer Agent RcGTA
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A variety of prokaryotes produce a bacteriophage-like gene transfer agent (GTA), and the alphaproteobacterial Rhodobacter capsulatus RcGTA is a model GTA. Some environmental isolates of R. capsulatus lack the ability to acquire genes transferred by the RcGTA (recipient capability). In this work, we investigated the reason why R. capsulatus strain 37b4 lacks recipient capability. The RcGTA head spike fiber and tail fiber proteins have been proposed to bind extracellular oligosaccharide receptors, and strain 37b4 lacks a capsular polysaccharide (CPS). The reason why strain 37b4 lacks a CPS was unknown, as was whether the provision of a CPS to 37b4 would result in recipient capability. To address these questions, we sequenced and annotated the strain 37b4 genome and used BLAST interrogations of this genome sequence to search for homologs of genes known to be needed for R. capsulatus recipient capability. We also created a cosmid-borne genome library from a wild-type strain, mobilized the library into 37b4, and used the cosmid-complemented strain 37b4 to identify genes needed for a gain of function, allowing for the acquisition of RcGTA-borne genes. The relative presence of CPS around a wild-type strain, 37b4, and cosmid-complemented 37b4 cells was visualized using light microscopy of stained cells. Fluorescently tagged head spike fiber and tail fiber proteins of the RcGTA particle were created and used to measure the relative binding to wild-type and 37b4 cells. We found that strain 37b4 lacks recipient capability because of an inability to bind RcGTA; the reason it is incapable of binding is that it lacks CPS, and the absence of CPS is due to the absence of genes previously shown to be needed for CPS production in another strain. In addition to the head spike fiber, we found that the tail fiber protein also binds to the CPS.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".