The Experience of Parents of Children With Genetically Determined Leukoencephalopathies With the Health Care System: A Qualitative Study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Parents of children with genetically determined leukoencephalopathies play a major role in their children's health care. We sought to gain a better understanding of their experience with the public health care system in Quebec, Canada, to obtain suggestions for improving their services, and to identify modifiable factors to improve their quality of life. We conducted interviews with 13 parents. Data was analyzed thematically. Five themes were identified: challenges of the diagnostic odyssey, limited access to services, excessive parental responsibilities, positive relationships with health care professionals as a facilitator of care, and benefits of a specialized leukodystrophy clinic. Parents felt like waiting for the diagnosis was extremely stressful, and they expressed their need for transparency during this period. They identified multiple gaps and barriers in the health care system, which burdened them with many responsibilities. Parents emphasized the importance of a positive relationship with their child's health care professionals. They also felt grateful for being followed at a specialized clinic as it improved the quality of care received.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.008 | 0.017 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.010 | 0.007 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".