Algorithm for intersecting symbolic and approximate linear differential varieties
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This article provides algorithms for systems of approximate linear partial differential equations that exploit exact subsystems. Such exact systems have rational function coefficients over $\mathbb{Q}$ and can be reduced to forms (e.g. differential Gröbner bases) by a finite number of differentiations and eliminations using available computer implementations. We will use the rifsimp algorithm in Maple for this purpose. Such algorithms use solvers based on orderings (rankings) of their derivatives, are coordinate dependent, and are prone to instability when applied to approximate input. In contrast, our Geometric Involutive Form algorithm, uses a sequence of geometric differentiations (prolongations) and projections to complete approximate linear systems to geometric involutive form. In particular, it uses numerical linear algebra (especially the SVD) to monitor dimension criteria for termination. However, this latter method can be expensive as the size of the matrices rapidly increases with the number of variables and order of derivatives involved.Approximate differential systems in applications often have exact subsystems and this motivated us to develop the hybrid method described in this article. The first step of the method is to partition the input into an exact subsystem and an approximate subsystem. The exact subsystem is reduced by using our rifsimp algorithm. The reduced exact subsystem is used to simplify the approximate subsystem. The previous partition, reduction and simplification steps are repeated until no new exact equations are found. Then the reduced exact subsystem is used to simplify prolongations of the approximate subsystem. Checking that the jointly prolonged system is geometrically involutive is done by computing dimension criteria of the simplified prolonged approximate system and using the differential Hilbert function of the reduced exact system.Our algorithm is illustrated by determination of approximate symmetry properties of a gravitational potential for a gaseous cloud. It enables a significant reduction of the size of the coefficient matrices of prolongations involved in numerical computations compared to our previous approach. For instance, the dimension of the jet space used for approximate calculations is reduced from dim J7= 1320 to dim J1= 20.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.036 | 0.009 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".