MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Algorithm for intersecting symbolic and approximate linear differential varieties

2022· article· en· W4378191906 on OpenAlexaff
Siyuan Deng, Zahra Mohammadi, Gregory J. Reid

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicNumerical methods for differential equations
Canadian institutionsUniversity of GuelphWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPartition (number theory)MathematicsOrdinary differential equationExact solutions in general relativityLinear differential equationDifferential equationLinear systemSequence (biology)Dimension (graph theory)AlgorithmApplied mathematicsPure mathematicsMathematical analysisCombinatorics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article provides algorithms for systems of approximate linear partial differential equations that exploit exact subsystems. Such exact systems have rational function coefficients over $\mathbb{Q}$ and can be reduced to forms (e.g. differential Gröbner bases) by a finite number of differentiations and eliminations using available computer implementations. We will use the rifsimp algorithm in Maple for this purpose. Such algorithms use solvers based on orderings (rankings) of their derivatives, are coordinate dependent, and are prone to instability when applied to approximate input. In contrast, our Geometric Involutive Form algorithm, uses a sequence of geometric differentiations (prolongations) and projections to complete approximate linear systems to geometric involutive form. In particular, it uses numerical linear algebra (especially the SVD) to monitor dimension criteria for termination. However, this latter method can be expensive as the size of the matrices rapidly increases with the number of variables and order of derivatives involved.Approximate differential systems in applications often have exact subsystems and this motivated us to develop the hybrid method described in this article. The first step of the method is to partition the input into an exact subsystem and an approximate subsystem. The exact subsystem is reduced by using our rifsimp algorithm. The reduced exact subsystem is used to simplify the approximate subsystem. The previous partition, reduction and simplification steps are repeated until no new exact equations are found. Then the reduced exact subsystem is used to simplify prolongations of the approximate subsystem. Checking that the jointly prolonged system is geometrically involutive is done by computing dimension criteria of the simplified prolonged approximate system and using the differential Hilbert function of the reduced exact system.Our algorithm is illustrated by determination of approximate symmetry properties of a gravitational potential for a gaseous cloud. It enables a significant reduction of the size of the coefficient matrices of prolongations involved in numerical computations compared to our previous approach. For instance, the dimension of the jet space used for approximate calculations is reduced from dim J<sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">7</sup> = 1320 to dim J<sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">1</sup> = 20.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.670
Threshold uncertainty score0.553

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.073
GPT teacher head0.356
Teacher spread0.283 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicNumerical methods for differential equationsFrench-language works237,207