MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4378191996 · doi:10.1016/j.healun.2022.12.004

The 2023 International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation Guidelines for Mechanical Circulatory Support: A 10- Year Update

2023· article· en· W4378191996 on OpenAlexaff
Diyar Saeed, David S. Feldman, Aly El Banayosy, Emma J. Birks, Elizabeth D. Blume, Jennifer Cowger, Chris Hayward, Ulrich P. Jorde, Jamila Kremer, Guy A. MacGowan, Simon Maltais, Simon Maybaum, Mandeep R. Mehra, Keyur B. Shah, Paul Mohaçsi, Martin Schweiger, Sarah E. Schroeder, Palak Shah, Marvin J. Slepian, Laurens F. Tops, Paulino Alvarez, Francisco A. Arabía, Saima Aslam, Louis Benson-Louis, Edo Y. Birati, Holger Buchholz, Ari Cedars, Dawn Christensen, Agnieszka Ciarka, Erin Coglianese, Rebecca Cogswell, Jennifer L. Cook, Jack G. Copeland, José González‐Costello, Stavros G. Drakos, Pirooz Eghtesady, Tonya Elliot, Jerry D. Estep, Jaime‐Juergen Eulert‐Grehn, De Rita Fabrizio, Jens Garbade, Jill M. Gelow, Maya Guglin, Jaime Hernández-Montfort, Doug Horstmanshof, Ranjit John, Manreet Kanwar, Feras Khaliel, Gene Kim, Sachin Kumar, Jacob Lavee, Marzia Leache, Pascal Leprince, Antonio Loforte, Jiří Malý, Samer S. Najjar, Ivan Netuka, Salpy V. Pamboukian, Snehal R. Patel, Sean Pinney, C. Vander Pluym, Evgenij Potapov, D. Robson, Yogita Rochlani, Stuart Russell, Kristin E. Sandau, Elena Sandoval, Gabriel Sayer, Sarah Schettle, David Schibilsky, Thomas Schlöglhofer, Jan D. Schmitto, Aleem Siddique, Scott Silvestry, Mark S. Slaughter, Benjamin Sun, Hiroo Takayama, Ryan J. Tedford, Jeffrey J. Teuteberg, Van‐Khue Ton, Nir Uriel, Juliane Vierecke, Daniel Zimpfer, David A. D’Alessandro

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMechanical Circulatory Support Devices
Canadian institutionsStollery Children's Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCirculatory systemLung transplantationTransplantationMedicineIntensive care medicineHeart transplantationLungCardiologyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.011
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.031
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.060

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0110.031
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.003
Bibliometrics0.0070.006
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0050.004
Open science0.0030.002
Research integrity0.0060.008
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.300
Teacher spread0.272 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations293
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Heart and Lung TransplantationSame topicMechanical Circulatory Support DevicesFrench-language works237,207