Noi tendințe în analiza sincronică și diacronică a minorității germane din Bucovina
Bibliographic record
Abstract
"The “Bukowina-Institut” [Bukovina Institute] in Augsburg was founded in 1988, at the initiative of Georg Simnacher, a politician who, at that time, was the president of the Schwaben Regional Council. The purpose of the institute was to research on scientific bases the multiethnic and multicultural space of Bukovina and to create efficient bridges of communication and collaboration with institutions and organizations from historical Bukovina, located on the territory of Romania and Ukraine. There was a close collaboration between the institute and the “Landsmannschaft der Buchenlanddeutschen”, an organization that was founded in 1949 in Munich to represent the social and cultural interests of the Bukovinian Germans in the Federal Republic of Germany. It can therefore be admitted that the institute in Augsburg had both a scientific and a political mission. It must be pointed out, however, that the political mission was fully in line with the fundamental principles and values that formed the basis for the building of the European Union. In 2003 the institute was integrated into the University of Augsburg and the fundamental directions of activity changed. The researchers newly co-opted in the Bukovina Institute were of the opinion that in the past too much importance was given to the research of the German aspects of the Bukovinaʼs culture and civilization. Then, it was considered that in the 1990s, due to the affinity and interdependence existing between the institute and the organization “Landsmannschaft der Buchenlanddeutschen”, the historical sources were not critically approached, being capitalized mainly narratives meant to give a meaning and a collective identity to the “Christian Germanophones” from Bukovina. In the present work are highlighted, on the basis of studies regarding the Bukovinian Germans, some new tendencies that manifest themselves in the current German historiography. "
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.008 | 0.011 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.018 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".