MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4378373884 · doi:10.1055/a-2101-7860

Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy Fatigue Trajectories

2023· article· en· W4378373884 on OpenAlexaff
Yi Wei, Mona Hnaini, B El-Aloul, Eugenio Zapata‐Aldana, Craig Campbell

Bibliographic record

VenueNeuropediatrics · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicMuscle Physiology and Disorders
Canadian institutionsWestern UniversityLondon Health Sciences Centre
FundersPTC Therapeutics
KeywordsMedicineDuchenne muscular dystrophyProxy (statistics)Physical therapyQuality of life (healthcare)Internal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

INTRODUCTION: Children with Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) are at risk of experiencing fatigue that negatively impacts their health-related quality of life (HRQoL). This study aimed to assess the association between fatigue and HRQoL, by examining fatigue trajectories over 48 weeks, and assessing factors associated with these fatigue trajectories. METHODS: The study sample consisted of 173 DMD subjects enrolled in a 48-week-long phase 2 clinical trial (NCT00592553) for a novel therapeutic who were between the ages of 5 and 16 years. RESULTS: = 0.47 for child self-report and 0.36 for parent proxy report) were significantly associated with one another. Three unique fatigue trajectories using Latent Class Growth Models were identified for child and parent proxy reported fatigue. The risk of being in the high fatigue group as compared to the low fatigue group increased by 24% with each year increase in age and also with decreasing walking distance, as reported by children and parent proxy, respectively. CONCLUSION: This study identified fatigue trajectories and risk factors associated with greater fatigue, helping clinicians and researchers identify the profile of fatigue in DMD children.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.760
Threshold uncertainty score0.541

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNeuropediatricsSame topicMuscle Physiology and DisordersFrench-language works237,207