Presentation Letter From James McDonald
Bibliographic record
Abstract
It is an honour to present this book documenting the first 100 years of The Study's history to the entire Study Community.For us, this work has been awaited for some time and we are grateful it is now in our hands.We are also pleased to know that our publisher believes our history will be of interest to people beyond our immediate community: those who are interested in the history of Westmount and Montreal, the history of education, and perhaps those whose concentration is in women's studies.So I would welcome you to the Study Community as well.I believe that anyone who reads this book will come to understand that The Study is, in fact, no ordinary school and that we have managed, over the first 100 years, to foster a culture of attention to the needs of each student while at the same time being sure she understands the need to do her very best both for herself and her community.Remarkably, we have placed ourselves squarely in the context of the needs of the times and have become innovative in our responses to those times.As we embark on our next century, the school is again reimagining itself in light of our desire to offer the kind of education we feel is most appropriate for the families whose daughters we serve and for the society as a whole.Thus the book is a celebration, not only of an institution but also of all who have been part of the institution over the past 100 years and who continue to be part of our future.On behalf of the current Board of Governors as well as past and future boards I would like to say congratulations on a century of achievement and a heartfelt thank you to everyone who has been part of this remarkable school.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".