Smart Health Monitoring Using Deep Learning and Artificial Intelligence
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The genesis and spread of illnesses are a major concern in today's rapidly developing technological and evolutionary environment. The prevention and management of illnesses using technological means have emerged as one of the most pressing challenges facing the medical community. With today's hectic schedules, it's nearly impossible to stick to a healthy routine. The problems above can be fixed by using a smart health monitoring system. Two of the most rapidly emerging technologies are the Internet of Things (IoT) and artificial intelligence (AI). As more people relocate to urban areas, the idea of a "smart city" has become increasingly commonplace. Increased efficiency, decreased expenses, and a renewed emphasis on improving the quality of care provided to patients are central to the idea of a "smart city." There has to be a thorough familiarity with the various smart city frameworks before the Internet of Things (IoT) and artificial intelligence (AI) can be effectively used for remote healthcare monitoring (RHM) systems. Technologies, gadgets, systems, models, designs, use cases, and applications are all examples of frameworks. The RHM system, based on the Internet of Things, relies heavily on artificial intelligence (AI) and deep learning (DL) to analyse the data it collects. However, DL techniques are widely utilised for making analytical representations, and they are included in CDSS and other kinds of healthcare services. Patients are given personalised recommendations for therapy, lifestyle changes, and care plans by clinical decision support systems after each element is thoroughly analysed. Supporting healthcare applications, this technology may assess activities, etc. In light of this, this paper presents a survey that zeroes in on the best smart city applications for the Internet of Things in health. By analysing the most important monitoring applications across many models using appropriate IoT-based sensors, this research provides a comprehensive assessment of the technologies and systems involved in providing RHM services. Finally, this study makes a contribution to scientific understanding by identifying the primary constraints on this field of study and suggesting directions for further investigation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".