Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Precise synthesis at the atomic scale is a highly desirable and controllable route for the preparation of heterogeneous catalysts with the desired structure and properties, which promotes the rational design of highly efficient catalysts and facilitates the understanding of structure-properties relationship. The precise construction of the active sites of the catalysts provides important opportunities for atomic insight into the correlation between structure and catalytic performance. In this review, the atomic-level tuning strategies for the precise synthesis of heterogeneous catalysts are summarized with the emphasis on the precise control of the structure of active sites, including single atom sites, dual atom sites and complex active sites. Furthermore, we illustrate the crucial role of atomic-level regulation of structure in determining the catalytic performance by providing typical catalysis examples in different reactions. In the end, some perspectives on the further development of precise synthesis of catalysts at the atomic level are presented.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.017 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it