Improving flat fluorescence microscopy in scattering tissue through deep learning strategies
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Intravital microscopy in small animals growingly contributes to the visualization of short- and long-term mammalian biological processes. Miniaturized fluorescence microscopy has revolutionized the observation of live animals' neural circuits. The technology's ability to further miniaturize to improve freely moving experimental settings is limited by its standard lens-based layout. Typical miniature microscope designs contain a stack of heavy and bulky optical components adjusted at relatively long distances. Computational lensless microscopy can overcome this limitation by replacing the lenses with a simple thin mask. Among other critical applications, Flat Fluorescence Microscope (FFM) holds promise to allow for real-time brain circuits imaging in freely moving animals, but recent research reports show that the quality needs to be improved, compared with imaging in clear tissue, for instance. Although promising results were reported with mask-based fluorescence microscopes in clear tissues, the impact of light scattering in biological tissue remains a major challenge. The outstanding performance of deep learning (DL) networks in computational flat cameras and imaging through scattering media studies motivates the development of deep learning models for FFMs. Our holistic ray-tracing and Monte Carlo FFM computational model assisted us in evaluating deep scattering medium imaging with DL techniques. We demonstrate that physics-based DL models combined with the classical reconstruction technique of the alternating direction method of multipliers (ADMM) perform a fast and robust image reconstruction, particularly in the scattering medium. The structural similarity indexes of the reconstructed images in scattering media recordings were increased by up to 20% compared with the prevalent iterative models. We also introduce and discuss the challenges of DL approaches for FFMs under physics-informed supervised and unsupervised learning.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".