Passive Microwave Sea Ice Edge Displacement Error over the Eastern Canadian Arctic for the period 2013-2021
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this study, sea ice edge derived from three passive microwave (PM) algorithms, ARTIST sea ice (ASI), enhanced NASA Team 2 (NT2), and Bootstrap (BT), are compared to those derived from the daily Canadian Ice Service charts over a primarily seasonal ice zone in the eastern Canadian Arctic for 2013–2021. To determine the ice edge error, we introduced an edge-length-based displacement measure called the edge displacement error (EDE), a dimensionless measurement obtained by dividing the weighted average Hausdorff distance by the ice edge length. We found that the ASI algorithm has the highest EDE on average, while the BT algorithm has the lowest one. In October (the beginning of the freeze-up period), the ice edge exhibits significant meandering, and the EDE is less sensitive to changes in the charted area. In the freeze-up period, the PM algorithms have the highest mean EDE value relative to other months due to the appearance of thin ice. A greater range of EDE values was observed in April than in other months. Throughout this region, the wind speed varies the most in April and May, whereas in April, the air temperature fluctuates more than in the other months.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".