MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4378473123 · doi:10.1016/j.jcf.2023.05.013

Automatic bronchus and artery analysis on chest computed tomography to evaluate the effect of inhaled hypertonic saline in children aged 3-6 years with cystic fibrosis in a randomized clinical trial

2023· article· en· W4378473123 on OpenAlexafffund
Yuxin Chen, Qianting Lv, Eleni‐Rosalina Andrinopoulou, Leticia Gallardo-Estrella, Jean‐Paul Charbonnier, Daan Caudri, Stephanie D. Davis, Margaret Rosenfeld, Félix Ratjen, Richard A. Kronmal, Karen Hinckley Stukovsky, Stephen M. Stick, Harm A.W.M. Tiddens

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Cystic Fibrosis · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCystic Fibrosis Research Advances
Canadian institutionsHospital for Sick Children
FundersNational Health and Medical Research CouncilNational Institutes of HealthChoquette Family FoundationInnovative Medicines InitiativeCystic Fibrosis FoundationErasmus Medisch CentrumChiesi FarmaceuticiCystic Fibrosis Foundation TherapeuticsTelethon Kids Institute
KeywordsMedicineBronchusHypertonic salineCystic fibrosisAirwayBronchial arterySalineNuclear medicineRight Main BronchusAsthmaRadiologyInternal medicineAnesthesiaLungRespiratory disease

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BackgroundSHIP-CT showed that 48-week treatment with inhaled 7% hypertonic saline (HS) reduced airway abnormalities on chest CT using the manual PRAGMA-CF method relative to isotonic saline (IS) in children aged 3-6 years with cystic fibrosis (CF). An algorithm was developed and validated to automatically measure bronchus and artery (BA) dimensions of BA-pairs on chest CT. Aim of the study was to assess the effect of HS on bronchial wall thickening and bronchial widening using the BA-analysis.MethodsThe BA-analysis (LungQ, version 2.1.0.1, Thirona, Netherlands) automatically segments the bronchial tree and identifies the segmental bronchi (G0) and distal generations (G1-G10). Dimensions of each BA-pair are measured: diameters of bronchial outer wall (Bout), bronchial inner wall (Bin), bronchial wall thickness (Bwt), and artery (A). BA-ratios are computed: Bout/A and Bin/A to detect bronchial widening and Bwt/A and Bwa/Boa (=bronchial wall area/bronchial outer area) to detect bronchial wall thickening.Results113 baseline and 102 48-week scans of 115 SHIP-CT participants were analysed. LungQ measured at baseline and 48-weeks respectively 6,073 and 7,407 BA-pairs in the IS-group and 6,363 and 6,840 BA-pairs in the HS-group. At 48 weeks, Bwt/A (mean difference 0.011; 95%CI, 0.0017 to 0.020) and Bwa/Boa (mean difference 0.030; 95% 0.009 to 0.052) was significantly higher (worse) in the IS-group compared to the HS-group representing more severe bronchial wall thickening in the IS-group (p=0.025 and p=0.019 respectively). Bwt/A and Bwa/Boa decreased and Bin/A remained stable from baseline to 48 weeks in the HS while it declined in the IS-group (all p<0.001). There was no difference in progression of Bout/A between two treatment groups.ConclusionThe automatic BA-analysis showed a positive impact of inhaled HS on bronchial lumen and wall thickness, but no treatment effect on progression of bronchial widening over 48 weeks.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.011
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.010
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.589
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0110.010
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.005
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.332
Teacher spread0.318 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations22
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Cystic FibrosisSame topicCystic Fibrosis Research AdvancesFrench-language works237,207