Journal of Sociology & Social Welfare Vol. 28, No. 1 (March 2001)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
TABLE OF CONTENTS DEFINING HUMAN SERVICES - Chaim Zins SOCIAL WORK AND LABOR: A LOOK AT THE NORTH AMERICAN AGREEMENT ON LABOR COOPERATION - Constance Phelps CRIME RATES AND CONFIDENCE IN THE POLICE: AMERICA'S CHANGING ATTITUTES TOWARD CRIME AND POLICY, 1972-1999 - Georgia Ackerman, Bobbie Anderson, Scott Jensen, Randy Ludwig, Darrel Montero, Nicole Plante, and Vince Yanez THE EFFECTIVENESS AND ENFORCEMENT OF A TEEN CURFEW LAW - Richard D. Sutphen and Janet Ford THE INTERGENERATIONAL TRANSMISSION OF GRANDMOTHER-GRANDCHILD CO-RESIDENCY - Richard K. Caputo THE TRANSFORMATION OF RUSSIAN SOCIAL POLICY IN THE TRANSITION TOWARD A MARKET ECONOMY - Isabel Pla Julian NEIGHBOR'S KNOWLEDGE AND REACTION TO SUSPECTED CHILD ABUSE IN AN URBAN SETTING - Gary Paquin, John Schafer and Adam Carle RESIDENTIAL MOBILITY AND YOUTH WELL-BEING: RESEARCH, POLICY AND PRACTICE ISSUES - Edward Scanlon and Kevin Devine THE FINANCIAL VULNERABILITY OF PEOPLE WITH DISABILITIES: ASSESSING POVERTY RISKS - Andrew I. Batavia and Richard Beaulaurier BOOK REVIEWS Social Security for the Excluded Majority. Wouter van Ginneken (Ed.). Reviewed by Mizanur Miah, Southern Illinois University at Carbondale. Adolescents After Divorce. Christy M. Buchanan, Eleonor E. Maccoby and Sanford M. Dornbusch. Reviewed by Dorinda Noble, Louisiana State University. Independent Practice for the Mental Health Professional: Growing a Private Practice for the 21st Century. Ralph H. Earle and Dorothy J. Barnes. Reviewed by Rafael Herrera, University of California at Berkeley. Addictions and Native Americans. Lawrence Armand French. Reviewed by Michael Gorman, San Jose State University. Medicare Reform: Issues and Answers. Andrew J. Rettenmaier and Thomas R. Saving (Eds.). Reviewed by Deborah Schild Wilkinson, University of Michigan. BOOK NOTES Changing Politics of Canadian Social Policy. James R. Rice and Michael J. Prince. Poverty and Social Assistance in Transition Countries. Jeanine Braithwaite, Christiaan Grootaert and Branko Milanovic. What's Love Got to Do With it?: A Critical Look at American Charity. David Wagner. The Newer Deal: Social Work and Religion in Partnership. Raam A. Chaan with Robert J. Wineburg and Stephanie C. Boddie.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.086 | 0.025 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".