American war of independence occupies an important place among the remarkable events of world history
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The American War of Independence unleashed powerful political, social, and economic forces that would transform the new nation’s politics and society. It was including increased participation in politics and governance, the legal institutionalization of religious toleration, and the growth and diffusion of the population, particularly westward. The Revolution affected Native Americans by opening up western settlement and creating governments hostile to their territorial claims. Even more broadly, the Revolution ended the mercantilist economy, opening new opportunities in trade and manufacturing. In general, revolution involves widespread violence and societal unrest. The American Revolution or the U.S. War of Independence was comparatively light in comparison to these standards. In spite of all this, the American Revolution actually had huge long-term positive effects on people everywhere, not just those living in the newly established United States. The Seven Years' War was a sort of world war fought between 1756 and 1763. It included major political and strategically powerful countries of that time. It affected Europe, North America, Central America, West African coast, India, and Philippines. In the context of Indian history, it is called the Third Carnatic War (1757-63). In other regions of the world, it was known as The French and Indian War (North America, 1754-63); the Mamorian War (Sweden and Prussia, 1757-62); Third Silesian War (Prussia and Austria, 1756-63), etc. It is known as the War of the Conquest in Canada. While the American War of Independence (1775-83) is often regarded as a separate event, it can be seen as a direct consequence of the Seven Years' War. In this research article, we will explore how the Seven Years' War influenced and set the stage for the U.S. War of Independence.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".