A multiple sensitive attributes data publishing method with guaranteed information utility
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Data publishing methods can provide available information for analysis while preserving privacy. The multiple sensitive attributes data publishing, which preserves the relationship between sensitive attributes, may keep many records from being grouped and bring in a high record suppression ratio. Another category of multiple sensitive attributes data publishing, which reduces the possibility of record suppression by breaking the relationship between sensitive attributes, cannot provide the sensitive attributes association for analysis. Hence, the existing multiple sensitive attributes data publishing fails to fully account for the comprehensive information utility. To acquire a guaranteed information utility, this article defines comprehensive information loss that considers both the suppression of records and the relationship between sensitive attributes. A heuristic method is leveraged to discover the optimal anonymity scheme that has the lowest comprehensive information loss. The experimental results verify the practice of the proposed data publishing method with multiple sensitive attributes. The proposed method can guarantee information utility when compared with previous ones.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.014 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.026 | 0.006 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it